Wrike vs Height
Detailed comparison of capabilities, integrations, pricing, and governance
87/100
Wrike
Wrike â project management with AI Agents with multi-action chaining, sandbox testing, and transparent reasoning (GA Feb 2026).
Quick Verdict
Wrike excels at project management and large teams with a score of 87/100.
80/100
Height
Height â project management with AI-native project management where AI is embedded into every workflow â auto-triaging bugs, generating standup summaries, and suggesting task assignments based on team patterns.
Quick Verdict
Height excels at ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration with a score of 80/100.
Capabilities & Controls
| Aspect | Wrike | Height |
|---|---|---|
| Agile Fit | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Kanban Fit | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Waterfall Fit | 5/5 | 2/5 |
| AI Depth (avg) | 4.4/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Founded | 2006 | 2020 |
Core Features Comparison
Wrike Features
- AI Agents with multi-action chaining, sandbox testing, and transparent reasoning (GA Feb 2026)
- ML-powered project risk prediction via Knowledge Graph â forecasts delays before they happen
- Wrike Copilot â real-time AI teammate that answers questions about your project data
- AI content generation, task summaries, subitem creation, and NL automation rules
Height Features
- AI-native project management where AI is embedded into every workflow â auto-triaging bugs, generating standup summaries, and suggesting task assignments based on team patterns
- Natural language task creation and search: describe what you need in plain English and Height creates structured tasks with labels, assignees, and due dates
- Cross-team collaboration with multiple views (spreadsheet, Kanban, calendar, Gantt) and real-time multiplayer editing on tasks and docs
- Smart task deduplication and linking that automatically identifies related or duplicate tasks and suggests merges across projects
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Wrike | Height |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | per-seat | per-seat |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier Limits | Unlimited users, limited features, 2GB storage | Up to 5 users, unlimited tasks, basic AI features |
| Starting Paid Price | $10/user/month | $8.50/user/month |
| Pricing URL | View Wrike Pricing | View Height Pricing |
| Overall Score | 87/100 | 80/100 |
| Best For | Project Management, Large Teams, Enterprise | AI-First Teams, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Software Development |
Best Use Cases
Wrike Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Height Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Integrations & Governance
| Category | Wrike | Height | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Governance | Enterprise | Enterprise | Tie |
| Overall Score | 87/100 | 80/100 | Wrike |
The Bottom Line
Both Wrike and Height are capable AI PM tools. Wrike scores higher and is stronger for project management and large teams.
Choose Wrike if: you prioritize project management and large teams and want the higher-rated option (87/100).
Choose Height if: you prioritize ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.