Teamwork vs LaunchDarkly
Detailed comparison of capabilities, integrations, pricing, and governance
78/100
Teamwork
Teamwork by Teamwork.com â project management with Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and profitability reporting built for agencies and professional services.
Quick Verdict
Teamwork excels at agencies & professional services and client work management with a score of 78/100.
78/100
LaunchDarkly
LaunchDarkly â feature management platform with progressive delivery, experimentation, and AI-powered release orchestration.
Quick Verdict
LaunchDarkly excels at feature flag management and progressive delivery with a score of 78/100.
Capabilities & Controls
| Aspect | Teamwork | LaunchDarkly |
|---|---|---|
| Agile Fit | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Kanban Fit | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Waterfall Fit | 4/5 | 2/5 |
| AI Depth (avg) | 2.4/5 | 3.4/5 |
| Founded | 2007 | 2014 |
Core Features Comparison
Teamwork Features
- Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and profitability reporting built for agencies and professional services
- AI-powered project health scoring with automated risk detection and resource utilization forecasting across portfolios
- Workload management with capacity planning and automatic task reassignment when team members are overallocated
- Native CRM integration and client portal for external stakeholders to view progress without full project access
LaunchDarkly Features
- Guarded Releases pair progressive feature rollouts with real-time monitoring and automated rollback to identify regressions correlated to specific flag changes
- AI Configs enable runtime control of LLM prompts and model parameters through feature flags, letting teams A/B test AI model changes without code deploys
- Warehouse-native experimentation connects directly to Snowflake, BigQuery, and Databricks for product analytics without ETL pipelines
- Vega AI agent analyzes logs, traces, and metrics to identify root causes of issues and surface recommended fixes automatically
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Teamwork | LaunchDarkly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | per-seat | per service connection + MAU |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier Limits | Up to 5 users, 2 projects, basic task management | Unlimited seats and flags, 30 SDKs, 5K session replays, A/B tests |
| Starting Paid Price | $10.99/user/month | $12/service connection/month |
| Pricing URL | View Teamwork Pricing | View LaunchDarkly Pricing |
| Overall Score | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Best For | Agencies & Professional Services, Client Work Management, Resource Planning | Feature Flag Management, Progressive Delivery, Release Experimentation |
Best Use Cases
Teamwork Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
LaunchDarkly Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Integrations & Governance
| Category | Teamwork | LaunchDarkly | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Governance | Enterprise | Enterprise | Tie |
| Overall Score | 78/100 | 78/100 | Tie |
The Bottom Line
Both Teamwork and LaunchDarkly are capable AI PM tools. Teamwork scores higher and is stronger for agencies & professional services and client work management.
Choose Teamwork if: you prioritize agencies & professional services and client work management and prefer its specific approach.
Choose LaunchDarkly if: you prioritize feature flag management and progressive delivery and prefer its specific approach.