Teamwork vs Lark
Detailed comparison of capabilities, integrations, pricing, and governance
78/100
Teamwork
Teamwork by Teamwork.com â project management with Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and profitability reporting built for agencies and professional services.
Quick Verdict
Teamwork excels at agencies & professional services and client work management with a score of 78/100.
77/100
Lark
Lark by ByteDance â project management with All-in-one collaboration platform combining project management, docs, spreadsheets, video conferencing, and messaging in a single integrated workspace.
Quick Verdict
Lark excels at all-in-one collaboration and remote teams with a score of 77/100.
Capabilities & Controls
| Aspect | Teamwork | Lark |
|---|---|---|
| Agile Fit | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Kanban Fit | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Waterfall Fit | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| AI Depth (avg) | 2.4/5 | 3.4/5 |
| Founded | 2007 | 2019 |
Core Features Comparison
Teamwork Features
- Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and profitability reporting built for agencies and professional services
- AI-powered project health scoring with automated risk detection and resource utilization forecasting across portfolios
- Workload management with capacity planning and automatic task reassignment when team members are overallocated
- Native CRM integration and client portal for external stakeholders to view progress without full project access
Lark Features
- All-in-one collaboration platform combining project management, docs, spreadsheets, video conferencing, and messaging in a single integrated workspace
- AI-powered meeting transcription and summarization with automatic action item extraction and task creation from meeting notes
- Advanced spreadsheet-based project tracking with automation rules, custom formulas, and database views that rival Airtable's flexibility
- Built-in OKR tracking with alignment visualization across teams and automatic progress rollups from linked projects
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Teamwork | Lark |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | per-seat | per-seat |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier Limits | Up to 5 users, 2 projects, basic task management | Up to 50 users, 100GB storage, core features |
| Starting Paid Price | $10.99/user/month | $12/user/month |
| Pricing URL | View Teamwork Pricing | View Lark Pricing |
| Overall Score | 78/100 | 77/100 |
| Best For | Agencies & Professional Services, Client Work Management, Resource Planning | All-in-One Collaboration, Remote Teams, Cross-Functional Teams |
Best Use Cases
Teamwork Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Lark Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Integrations & Governance
| Category | Teamwork | Lark | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Governance | Enterprise | Enterprise | Tie |
| Overall Score | 78/100 | 77/100 | Teamwork |
The Bottom Line
Both Teamwork and Lark are capable AI PM tools. Teamwork scores higher and is stronger for agencies & professional services and client work management.
Choose Teamwork if: you prioritize agencies & professional services and client work management and want the higher-rated option (78/100).
Choose Lark if: you prioritize all-in-one collaboration and remote teams and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.