Teamwork vs InVideo
TL;DR
InVideo edges Teamwork on overall capability (78/100 vs 68/100), with the 10-point gap reflecting stronger product marketing and content creation fit. AI depth is comparable (4.0/5 vs 4.0/5), so AI capability is unlikely to be the decider — integration footprint and pricing usually break the tie. Both tools offer free tiers, so cost-of-entry is a wash — paid-tier feature parity and team-size economics are the deciding factors.
Teamwork
Quick Verdict
Teamwork excels at agencies & professional services and client work management with a score of 68/100.
InVideo
Quick Verdict
InVideo excels at product marketing and content creation with a score of 78/100.
Capabilities & Controls
| Aspect | Teamwork | InVideo |
|---|---|---|
| Agile Fit | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Kanban Fit | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Waterfall Fit | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| AI Depth (avg) | 4.0/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Founded | 2007 | 2017 |
Core Features Comparison
Teamwork Features
- Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and AI-powered profitability forecasting for agencies and professional services
- TeamworkAI suite: Project Wizard auto-generates projects from client briefs, Smart Scheduler optimizes assignment by availability and skills, AI Filter Assistant enables natural language task queries
- MCP server with 108 tools enabling AI agents (Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot) to create projects, assign tasks, and generate reports via natural language
- Workload management with AI utilization summaries, capacity planning, and unlimited free client portal access for external stakeholders
InVideo Features
- AI text-to-video generator — paste a prompt or URL, get a finished video with voiceover, scenes, and music
- 5000+ customizable templates for product launches, social media, ads, and explainer videos
- AI voiceover in 50+ languages with natural-sounding cloned voices
- 16M+ stock media library (images, video clips, audio) built into the editor
- Brand kit for consistent fonts, colors, and logos across team videos
- Real-time team collaboration with comments, version history, and shared workspaces
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Teamwork | InVideo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | per-seat | subscription |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier Limits | Up to 5 users, 2 projects, basic task management | 10 minutes per week, watermarked exports, limited stock media |
| Starting Paid Price | $10.99/user/month | $25/month |
| Pricing URL | View Teamwork Pricing | View InVideo Pricing |
| Overall Score | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Best For | Agencies & Professional Services, Client Work Management, Resource Planning | Product Marketing, Content Creation, Social Media Teams, Startup Founders, Cross-functional Teams |
Best Use Cases
Teamwork Excels At
- Project profitability tracking for client engagements
- Client portals with branded shared workspaces
- Resource utilization across concurrent client projects
- Integrated time tracking with billable hours and invoicing
InVideo Excels At
- Product Marketing workflows
- Content Creation workflows
- Social Media Teams workflows
Integrations & Governance
| Category | Teamwork | InVideo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Governance | Enterprise | Enterprise | Tie |
| Overall Score | 68/100 | 78/100 | InVideo |
How to Decide Between Teamwork and InVideo
Four questions usually settle the choice between these two. The answers below are computed from per-tool data, not editorial opinion — adjust weighting based on what matters most for your context.
Question 1: What's your team size?
Teamwork is positioned for larger teams and enterprise rollouts; InVideo is leaner. If you have 200+ users, formal procurement, and SSO/SCIM/audit requirements, Teamwork maps better. If you are under 50 users and want fast onboarding without IT review, InVideo is the lower-friction option.
Question 2: What's your primary delivery methodology?
Both tools score similarly on methodology fit (agile 4/5 vs 4/5, kanban 4/5 vs 3/5). Methodology won't be the decider here — feature mix and AI depth usually settle it.
Question 3: How AI-heavy is your workflow?
AI depth is comparable (4.0/5 vs 4.0/5), so AI capability won't tip the decision. Focus on which AI features specifically map to your workflow rather than the aggregate score.
Question 4: How sensitive are you on pricing?
Both tools offer free tiers, so cost-of-entry is a wash. The pricing distinction shows up at paid tiers — review the pricing comparison above for plan-by-plan breakdown, paying attention to per-seat vs flat pricing models if your team size will fluctuate.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Teamwork cheaper than InVideo?
Both Teamwork and InVideo offer free tiers. Differences appear at paid tiers — see the pricing table above for plan-by-plan comparison and starting paid prices.
Which scores higher, Teamwork or InVideo?
InVideo scores 78/100 vs 68/100 for Teamwork on our 100-point methodology — a 10-point margin reflecting stronger fit across capability depth, AI quality, integrations, and value.
Which has better AI features for product managers?
Both tools score evenly on AI depth (4.0/5). AI capability is unlikely to be the decider here — look at integrations and pricing instead.
Which fits agile and kanban teams better?
For agile teams, Teamwork scores 4/5 vs 4/5 for InVideo. For kanban, Teamwork scores 4/5 vs 3/5 for InVideo. Teamwork is the broader fit for sprint- or board-driven teams.
What does Teamwork excel at that InVideo doesn't?
Teamwork is positioned around agencies & professional services, client work management, resource planning — areas where InVideo doesn't market itself as the primary fit. PMs working primarily in those areas should weight Teamwork higher.
What does InVideo excel at that Teamwork doesn't?
InVideo is positioned around product marketing, content creation, social media teams — areas where Teamwork doesn't market itself as the primary fit. PMs working primarily in those areas should weight InVideo higher.
Which vendor is more established?
Teamwork (founded 2007) has 10 more years of market history than InVideo (founded 2017). For PMs prioritizing vendor stability, Teamwork carries the longer track record; InVideo represents the more recent generation of tooling.
Other Comparisons in This Category
Still narrowing the field? Here are head-to-head matchups against the next-highest-scoring Project Management tools in our directory.
The Bottom Line
Both Teamwork and InVideo are capable AI PM tools. InVideo scores higher and is stronger for product marketing and content creation.
Choose Teamwork if
you prioritize agencies & professional services and client work management and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.
Choose InVideo if
you prioritize product marketing and content creation and want the higher-rated option (78/100).