Height vs Teamwork
TL;DR
Height edges Teamwork on overall capability (80/100 vs 68/100), with the 12-point gap reflecting stronger ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration fit. AI depth is comparable (4.0/5 vs 4.0/5), so AI capability is unlikely to be the decider — integration footprint and pricing usually break the tie. Both tools offer free tiers, so cost-of-entry is a wash — paid-tier feature parity and team-size economics are the deciding factors.
Height
Quick Verdict
Height excels at ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration with a score of 80/100.
Teamwork
Quick Verdict
Teamwork excels at agencies & professional services and client work management with a score of 68/100.
Capabilities & Controls
| Aspect | Height | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Agile Fit | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Kanban Fit | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Waterfall Fit | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| AI Depth (avg) | 4.0/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Founded | 2020 | 2007 |
Core Features Comparison
Height Features
- AI-native project management where AI is embedded into every workflow — auto-triaging bugs, generating standup summaries, and suggesting task assignments based on team patterns
- Natural language task creation and search: describe what you need in plain English and Height creates structured tasks with labels, assignees, and due dates
- Cross-team collaboration with multiple views (spreadsheet, Kanban, calendar, Gantt) and real-time multiplayer editing on tasks and docs
- Smart task deduplication and linking that automatically identifies related or duplicate tasks and suggests merges across projects
Teamwork Features
- Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and AI-powered profitability forecasting for agencies and professional services
- TeamworkAI suite: Project Wizard auto-generates projects from client briefs, Smart Scheduler optimizes assignment by availability and skills, AI Filter Assistant enables natural language task queries
- MCP server with 108 tools enabling AI agents (Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot) to create projects, assign tasks, and generate reports via natural language
- Workload management with AI utilization summaries, capacity planning, and unlimited free client portal access for external stakeholders
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Height | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | per-seat | per-seat |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier Limits | Up to 5 users, unlimited tasks, basic AI features | Up to 5 users, 2 projects, basic task management |
| Starting Paid Price | $8.50/user/month | $10.99/user/month |
| Pricing URL | View Height Pricing | View Teamwork Pricing |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 68/100 |
| Best For | AI-First Teams, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Software Development | Agencies & Professional Services, Client Work Management, Resource Planning |
Best Use Cases
Height Excels At
- AI-First Teams workflows
- Cross-Functional Collaboration workflows
- Software Development workflows
Teamwork Excels At
- Project profitability tracking for client engagements
- Client portals with branded shared workspaces
- Resource utilization across concurrent client projects
- Integrated time tracking with billable hours and invoicing
Integrations & Governance
| Category | Height | Teamwork | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Governance | Enterprise | Enterprise | Tie |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 68/100 | Height |
How to Decide Between Height and Teamwork
Four questions usually settle the choice between these two. The answers below are computed from per-tool data, not editorial opinion — adjust weighting based on what matters most for your context.
Question 1: What's your team size?
Teamwork is positioned for larger teams and enterprise rollouts; Height is leaner. If you have 200+ users, formal procurement, and SSO/SCIM/audit requirements, Teamwork maps better. If you are under 50 users and want fast onboarding without IT review, Height is the lower-friction option.
Question 2: What's your primary delivery methodology?
Height fits sprint- and board-driven teams better (agile 5/5 vs 4/5; kanban 5/5 vs 4/5 — Height ahead on both axes). For waterfall or hybrid programs, Teamwork has the edge (waterfall 2/5 vs 4/5).
Question 3: How AI-heavy is your workflow?
AI depth is comparable (4.0/5 vs 4.0/5), so AI capability won't tip the decision. Focus on which AI features specifically map to your workflow rather than the aggregate score.
Question 4: How sensitive are you on pricing?
Both tools offer free tiers, so cost-of-entry is a wash. The pricing distinction shows up at paid tiers — review the pricing comparison above for plan-by-plan breakdown, paying attention to per-seat vs flat pricing models if your team size will fluctuate.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Height cheaper than Teamwork?
Both Height and Teamwork offer free tiers. Differences appear at paid tiers — see the pricing table above for plan-by-plan comparison and starting paid prices.
Which scores higher, Height or Teamwork?
Height scores 80/100 vs 68/100 for Teamwork on our 100-point methodology — a 12-point margin reflecting stronger fit across capability depth, AI quality, integrations, and value.
Which has better AI features for product managers?
Both tools score evenly on AI depth (4.0/5). AI capability is unlikely to be the decider here — look at integrations and pricing instead.
Which fits agile and kanban teams better?
For agile teams, Height scores 5/5 vs 4/5 for Teamwork. For kanban, Height scores 5/5 vs 4/5 for Teamwork. Height is the broader fit for sprint- or board-driven teams.
What does Height excel at that Teamwork doesn't?
Height is positioned around ai-first teams, cross-functional collaboration, software development — areas where Teamwork doesn't market itself as the primary fit. PMs working primarily in those areas should weight Height higher.
What does Teamwork excel at that Height doesn't?
Teamwork is positioned around agencies & professional services, client work management, resource planning — areas where Height doesn't market itself as the primary fit. PMs working primarily in those areas should weight Teamwork higher.
Which vendor is more established?
Teamwork (founded 2007) has 13 more years of market history than Height (founded 2020). For PMs prioritizing vendor stability, Teamwork carries the longer track record; Height represents the more recent generation of tooling.
Other Comparisons in This Category
Still narrowing the field? Here are head-to-head matchups against the next-highest-scoring Project Management tools in our directory.
The Bottom Line
Both Height and Teamwork are capable AI PM tools. Height scores higher and is stronger for ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration.
Choose Height if
you prioritize ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration and want the higher-rated option (80/100).
Choose Teamwork if
you prioritize agencies & professional services and client work management and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.