Height vs Teamwork vs Wrike
Comparing Height, Teamwork, and Wrike for AI-powered project management in 2026: Wrike leads with a score of 87/100, followed by Height at 80/100 and Teamwork at 78/100. Wrike stands out for project management and large teams, while Height excels at ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration and Teamwork offers strengths in agencies & professional services and client work management.
Height
Quick Verdict
Height excels at ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration with a score of 80/100.
Teamwork
Quick Verdict
Teamwork excels at agencies & professional services and client work management with a score of 78/100.
Wrike
Quick Verdict
Wrike excels at project management and large teams with a score of 87/100.
Head-to-Head-to-Head Summary
| Dimension | Height | Teamwork | Wrike | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 78/100 | 87/100 | Wrike |
| Best For | AI-First Teams, Cross-Functional Collaboration | Agencies & Professional Services, Client Work Management | Project Management, Large Teams | â |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available | Free tier available | â |
| AI Depth (avg) | 4.0/5 | 2.4/5 | 4.4/5 | Wrike |
| Methodology Fit (avg) | 3.4/5 | 3.8/5 | 4.4/5 | Wrike |
| Ideal Team Size | Small, Mid | Small, Mid, Large | Mid, Large | â |
Capabilities & Controls
| Aspect | Height | Teamwork | Wrike |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agile Fit | 5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Kanban Fit | 5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Waterfall Fit | 2/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| AI Depth (avg) | 4.0/5 | 2.4/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Founded | 2020 | 2007 | 2006 |
Core Features Comparison
Height Features
- AI-native project management where AI is embedded into every workflow â auto-triaging bugs, generating standup summaries, and suggesting task assignments based on team patterns
- Natural language task creation and search: describe what you need in plain English and Height creates structured tasks with labels, assignees, and due dates
- Cross-team collaboration with multiple views (spreadsheet, Kanban, calendar, Gantt) and real-time multiplayer editing on tasks and docs
- Smart task deduplication and linking that automatically identifies related or duplicate tasks and suggests merges across projects
Teamwork Features
- Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and profitability reporting built for agencies and professional services
- AI-powered project health scoring with automated risk detection and resource utilization forecasting across portfolios
- Workload management with capacity planning and automatic task reassignment when team members are overallocated
- Native CRM integration and client portal for external stakeholders to view progress without full project access
Wrike Features
- AI Agents with multi-action chaining, sandbox testing, and transparent reasoning (GA Feb 2026)
- ML-powered project risk prediction via Knowledge Graph â forecasts delays before they happen
- Wrike Copilot â real-time AI teammate that answers questions about your project data
- AI content generation, task summaries, subitem creation, and NL automation rules
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Height | Teamwork | Wrike |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | per-seat | per-seat | per-seat |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier Limits | Up to 5 users, unlimited tasks, basic AI features | Up to 5 users, 2 projects, basic task management | Unlimited users, limited features, 2GB storage |
| Starting Paid Price | $8.50/user/month | $10.99/user/month | $10/user/month |
| Pricing URL | View Height Pricing | View Teamwork Pricing | View Wrike Pricing |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 78/100 | 87/100 |
| Best For | AI-First Teams, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Software Development | Agencies & Professional Services, Client Work Management, Resource Planning | Project Management, Large Teams, Enterprise |
Best Use Cases
Height Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Teamwork Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Wrike Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Integrations & Governance
| Category | Height | Teamwork | Wrike | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Robust | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Governance | Robust | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 78/100 | 87/100 | Wrike |
Stack Recommendation
If your team is evaluating these three tools and considering using two together, here's our analysis based on integration compatibility and methodology overlap.
Best Combination: Height + Teamwork
Height and Teamwork make the strongest pairing of these three tools. Height covers ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration, while Teamwork complements with agencies & professional services and client work management. Together they provide broader coverage than either tool alone.
When to pick Wrike instead: If your team primarily needs project management and large teams, Wrike (87/100) may be the better standalone choice.
The Bottom Line
Among Height, Teamwork, and Wrike, Wrike scores highest at 87/100 and is the strongest for project management and large teams. Height (80/100) is a strong contender for ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration. Teamwork (78/100) rounds out the trio with focus on agencies & professional services and client work management. Your best choice depends on team size, methodology preference, and budget.
Choose Height if: you prioritize ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration and want the higher-rated option (80/100).
Choose Teamwork if: you prioritize agencies & professional services and client work management and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.
Choose Wrike if: you prioritize project management and large teams and want the higher-rated option (87/100).
Related Comparisons
Explore head-to-head matchups between these tools, or dive deeper into individual tool reviews.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is the best overall: Height, Teamwork, or Wrike?
Based on our scoring methodology, Wrike leads with 87/100. It scores highest due to project management and large teams. However, the best choice depends on your team's specific needs, methodology preferences, and budget.
What is the cheapest option between Height, Teamwork, and Wrike?
Height and Teamwork and Wrike offer a free tier. Both are available at no cost for small teams, making them the most budget-friendly starting point. Paid plans start at different price points depending on features needed.
Which tool is better for agile teams: Height, Teamwork, or Wrike?
For agile workflows, Height rates highest with an agile fit score of 5/5, followed by Teamwork (4/5) and Wrike (4/5). Consider sprint planning features, velocity tracking, and backlog management when making your choice.
Can Height and Teamwork be used together?
Height and Teamwork can be connected through third-party integration platforms like Zapier or Make. While there may not be a direct native integration, API access from both tools enables custom workflows and data synchronization.
What are the main differences between Height, Teamwork, and Wrike?
Height (80/100) focuses on ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration. Teamwork (78/100) specializes in agencies & professional services and client work management. Wrike (87/100) is strongest for project management and large teams. Each serves different team sizes and methodology preferences.