Height vs Teamwork
Detailed comparison of capabilities, integrations, pricing, and governance
80/100
Height
Height â project management with AI-native project management where AI is embedded into every workflow â auto-triaging bugs, generating standup summaries, and suggesting task assignments based on team patterns.
Quick Verdict
Height excels at ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration with a score of 80/100.
78/100
Teamwork
Teamwork by Teamwork.com â project management with Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and profitability reporting built for agencies and professional services.
Quick Verdict
Teamwork excels at agencies & professional services and client work management with a score of 78/100.
Capabilities & Controls
| Aspect | Height | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Agile Fit | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Kanban Fit | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Waterfall Fit | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| AI Depth (avg) | 4.0/5 | 2.4/5 |
| Founded | 2020 | 2007 |
Core Features Comparison
Height Features
- AI-native project management where AI is embedded into every workflow â auto-triaging bugs, generating standup summaries, and suggesting task assignments based on team patterns
- Natural language task creation and search: describe what you need in plain English and Height creates structured tasks with labels, assignees, and due dates
- Cross-team collaboration with multiple views (spreadsheet, Kanban, calendar, Gantt) and real-time multiplayer editing on tasks and docs
- Smart task deduplication and linking that automatically identifies related or duplicate tasks and suggests merges across projects
Teamwork Features
- Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and profitability reporting built for agencies and professional services
- AI-powered project health scoring with automated risk detection and resource utilization forecasting across portfolios
- Workload management with capacity planning and automatic task reassignment when team members are overallocated
- Native CRM integration and client portal for external stakeholders to view progress without full project access
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Height | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | per-seat | per-seat |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier Limits | Up to 5 users, unlimited tasks, basic AI features | Up to 5 users, 2 projects, basic task management |
| Starting Paid Price | $8.50/user/month | $10.99/user/month |
| Pricing URL | View Height Pricing | View Teamwork Pricing |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 78/100 |
| Best For | AI-First Teams, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Software Development | Agencies & Professional Services, Client Work Management, Resource Planning |
Best Use Cases
Height Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Teamwork Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Integrations & Governance
| Category | Height | Teamwork | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Governance | Enterprise | Enterprise | Tie |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 78/100 | Height |
The Bottom Line
Both Height and Teamwork are capable AI PM tools. Height scores higher and is stronger for ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration.
Choose Height if: you prioritize ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration and want the higher-rated option (80/100).
Choose Teamwork if: you prioritize agencies & professional services and client work management and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.