Height vs Lark
Detailed comparison of capabilities, integrations, pricing, and governance
80/100
Height
Height â project management with AI-native project management where AI is embedded into every workflow â auto-triaging bugs, generating standup summaries, and suggesting task assignments based on team patterns.
Quick Verdict
Height excels at ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration with a score of 80/100.
77/100
Lark
Lark by ByteDance â project management with All-in-one collaboration platform combining project management, docs, spreadsheets, video conferencing, and messaging in a single integrated workspace.
Quick Verdict
Lark excels at all-in-one collaboration and remote teams with a score of 77/100.
Capabilities & Controls
| Aspect | Height | Lark |
|---|---|---|
| Agile Fit | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Kanban Fit | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Waterfall Fit | 2/5 | 3/5 |
| AI Depth (avg) | 4.0/5 | 3.4/5 |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
Core Features Comparison
Height Features
- AI-native project management where AI is embedded into every workflow â auto-triaging bugs, generating standup summaries, and suggesting task assignments based on team patterns
- Natural language task creation and search: describe what you need in plain English and Height creates structured tasks with labels, assignees, and due dates
- Cross-team collaboration with multiple views (spreadsheet, Kanban, calendar, Gantt) and real-time multiplayer editing on tasks and docs
- Smart task deduplication and linking that automatically identifies related or duplicate tasks and suggests merges across projects
Lark Features
- All-in-one collaboration platform combining project management, docs, spreadsheets, video conferencing, and messaging in a single integrated workspace
- AI-powered meeting transcription and summarization with automatic action item extraction and task creation from meeting notes
- Advanced spreadsheet-based project tracking with automation rules, custom formulas, and database views that rival Airtable's flexibility
- Built-in OKR tracking with alignment visualization across teams and automatic progress rollups from linked projects
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Height | Lark |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | per-seat | per-seat |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier Limits | Up to 5 users, unlimited tasks, basic AI features | Up to 50 users, 100GB storage, core features |
| Starting Paid Price | $8.50/user/month | $12/user/month |
| Pricing URL | View Height Pricing | View Lark Pricing |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 77/100 |
| Best For | AI-First Teams, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Software Development | All-in-One Collaboration, Remote Teams, Cross-Functional Teams |
Best Use Cases
Height Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Lark Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Integrations & Governance
| Category | Height | Lark | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Governance | Enterprise | Enterprise | Tie |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 77/100 | Height |
The Bottom Line
Both Height and Lark are capable AI PM tools. Height scores higher and is stronger for ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration.
Choose Height if: you prioritize ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration and want the higher-rated option (80/100).
Choose Lark if: you prioritize all-in-one collaboration and remote teams and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.