Airtable vs Linear
Detailed comparison of capabilities, integrations, pricing, and governance
96/100
Airtable
Airtable — project management with Database-first PM with AI assistants.
Quick Verdict
Airtable excels at project management and large teams with a score of 96/100.
90/100
Linear
Linear — project management with Fast issue tracking with AI-assisted descriptions.
Quick Verdict
Linear excels at project management and growing teams with a score of 90/100.
Capabilities & Controls
Aspect | Airtable | Linear |
---|---|---|
Planning Depth | Basic | Roadmaps/Timeline |
AI Capabilities | General AI | General AI |
Automation | Rules & workflows | Rules & workflows |
Security | Standard | Standard |
Core Features Comparison
Airtable Features
- Database-first PM with AI assistants
- Generate custom apps and interfaces from natural language
- Summarization, classification, and information extraction
- Automations and role-based permissions
Linear Features
- Fast issue tracking with AI-assisted descriptions
- Automated project updates and summaries
- Workflows and roadmaps with programmable automations
- Keyboard-first UX for engineers
Pricing & Value Analysis
Aspect | Airtable | Linear |
---|---|---|
Pricing URL | View Airtable Pricing | View Linear Pricing |
Overall Score | 96/100 | 90/100 |
Best For | Project Management, Large Teams | Project Management, Growing Teams, Strategic Planning |
Best Use Cases
Airtable Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Linear Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Integrations & Governance
Category | Airtable | Linear | Winner |
---|---|---|---|
Integrations | Robust | Robust | Tie |
Governance | Standard | Standard | Tie |
Overall Score | 96/100 | 90/100 | Airtable |
The Bottom Line
Both Airtable and Linear are capable AI PM tools. Airtable scores higher and is stronger for project management and large teams.
Choose Airtable if: you prioritize project management and large teams and want the higher-rated option (96/100).
Choose Linear if: you prioritize project management and growing teams and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.