Airtable vs Height vs Teamwork
Comparing Airtable, Height, and Teamwork for AI-powered project management in 2026: Height leads with a score of 80/100, followed by Airtable at 79/100 and Teamwork at 78/100. Height stands out for ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration, while Airtable excels at project management and large teams and Teamwork offers strengths in agencies & professional services and client work management.
Airtable
Quick Verdict
Airtable excels at project management and large teams with a score of 79/100.
Height
Quick Verdict
Height excels at ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration with a score of 80/100.
Teamwork
Quick Verdict
Teamwork excels at agencies & professional services and client work management with a score of 78/100.
Head-to-Head-to-Head Summary
| Dimension | Airtable | Height | Teamwork | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 79/100 | 80/100 | 78/100 | Height |
| Best For | Project Management, Large Teams | AI-First Teams, Cross-Functional Collaboration | Agencies & Professional Services, Client Work Management | â |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available | Free tier available | â |
| AI Depth (avg) | 3.2/5 | 4.0/5 | 2.4/5 | Height |
| Methodology Fit (avg) | 3.2/5 | 3.4/5 | 3.8/5 | Teamwork |
| Ideal Team Size | Small, Mid, Large | Small, Mid | Small, Mid, Large | â |
Capabilities & Controls
| Aspect | Airtable | Height | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agile Fit | 3/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Kanban Fit | 4/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Waterfall Fit | 3/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| AI Depth (avg) | 3.2/5 | 4.0/5 | 2.4/5 |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 | 2007 |
Core Features Comparison
Airtable Features
- Database-first PM with AI assistants
- Generate custom apps and interfaces from natural language
- Summarization, classification, and information extraction
- Automations and role-based permissions
Height Features
- AI-native project management where AI is embedded into every workflow â auto-triaging bugs, generating standup summaries, and suggesting task assignments based on team patterns
- Natural language task creation and search: describe what you need in plain English and Height creates structured tasks with labels, assignees, and due dates
- Cross-team collaboration with multiple views (spreadsheet, Kanban, calendar, Gantt) and real-time multiplayer editing on tasks and docs
- Smart task deduplication and linking that automatically identifies related or duplicate tasks and suggests merges across projects
Teamwork Features
- Client-facing project management with billable time tracking, budget monitoring, and profitability reporting built for agencies and professional services
- AI-powered project health scoring with automated risk detection and resource utilization forecasting across portfolios
- Workload management with capacity planning and automatic task reassignment when team members are overallocated
- Native CRM integration and client portal for external stakeholders to view progress without full project access
Pricing & Value Analysis
| Aspect | Airtable | Height | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | per-seat | per-seat | per-seat |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier Limits | Up to 1000 records per base, 1GB attachments, 100 automations/month | Up to 5 users, unlimited tasks, basic AI features | Up to 5 users, 2 projects, basic task management |
| Starting Paid Price | $20/user/month | $8.50/user/month | $10.99/user/month |
| Pricing URL | View Airtable Pricing | View Height Pricing | View Teamwork Pricing |
| Overall Score | 79/100 | 80/100 | 78/100 |
| Best For | Project Management, Large Teams | AI-First Teams, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Software Development | Agencies & Professional Services, Client Work Management, Resource Planning |
Best Use Cases
Airtable Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Height Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Teamwork Excels At
- Project planning and delivery
Integrations & Governance
| Category | Airtable | Height | Teamwork | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Robust | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Governance | Robust | Robust | Robust | Tie |
| Overall Score | 79/100 | 80/100 | 78/100 | Height |
Stack Recommendation
If your team is evaluating these three tools and considering using two together, here's our analysis based on integration compatibility and methodology overlap.
Best Combination: Height + Teamwork
Height and Teamwork make the strongest pairing of these three tools. Height covers ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration, while Teamwork complements with agencies & professional services and client work management. Together they provide broader coverage than either tool alone.
When to pick Airtable instead: If your team primarily needs project management and large teams, Airtable (79/100) may be the better standalone choice.
The Bottom Line
Among Airtable, Height, and Teamwork, Height scores highest at 80/100 and is the strongest for ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration. Airtable (79/100) is a strong contender for project management and large teams. Teamwork (78/100) rounds out the trio with focus on agencies & professional services and client work management. Your best choice depends on team size, methodology preference, and budget.
Choose Airtable if: you prioritize project management and large teams and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.
Choose Height if: you prioritize ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration and want the higher-rated option (80/100).
Choose Teamwork if: you prioritize agencies & professional services and client work management and prefer its feature mix despite a lower score.
Related Comparisons
Explore head-to-head matchups between these tools, or dive deeper into individual tool reviews.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is the best overall: Airtable, Height, or Teamwork?
Based on our scoring methodology, Height leads with 80/100. It scores highest due to ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration. However, the best choice depends on your team's specific needs, methodology preferences, and budget.
What is the cheapest option between Airtable, Height, and Teamwork?
Airtable and Height and Teamwork offer a free tier. Both are available at no cost for small teams, making them the most budget-friendly starting point. Paid plans start at different price points depending on features needed.
Which tool is better for agile teams: Airtable, Height, or Teamwork?
For agile workflows, Height rates highest with an agile fit score of 5/5, followed by Teamwork (4/5) and Airtable (3/5). Consider sprint planning features, velocity tracking, and backlog management when making your choice.
Can Airtable and Height be used together?
Airtable and Height can be connected through third-party integration platforms like Zapier or Make. While there may not be a direct native integration, API access from both tools enables custom workflows and data synchronization.
What are the main differences between Airtable, Height, and Teamwork?
Airtable (79/100) focuses on project management and large teams. Height (80/100) specializes in ai-first teams and cross-functional collaboration. Teamwork (78/100) is strongest for agencies & professional services and client work management. Each serves different team sizes and methodology preferences.